![]() ![]() If you want a full-fledged renaming tool, you may want to take a look at Advanced Renamer or FocusOn Renamer instead. I would have liked to have an option to revert the task, and restore the original names. You can put both options together in the command with the one that would have precedence in the case that some file has both tags as the. If two assignments affect the same tag, the latter takes precedence. Exiftool move all files to a directory structure '2020\05\03', AND rename the files to format '20200503-134367. Many tag values may be assigned in a single command. Exiftool move all files to a directory structure (based on month) '\05', without renaming the files themselves: exiftool -v -ext jpg -ext mp4 '-Directory ![]() But, before you proceed, make sure you have a backup of your pictures. The program does not edit the media in any way, so the quality remains the same. If the files don't have any EXIF info, they will not be renamed. Hit the next button to start the renaming process, you will see a progress bar as Nameexif checks the media that you selected to see if they have EXIF tags. ![]() In case of files which have the same date/time, the tool adds an incremental numberà to the name. In addition to these settings, you can also adjust the time stamp with a custom value. If there was already an extension, this will add the proper extension at the end of the false extension e.g. The program can also use the ISO information to rename the files. exiftool -ext '' '-testnameworks but the sequencing keeps counting up. What I'm trying to do view all assets within a series of folders which I can do via View -> Show Items from Subfolders. I found some older posts which said it was not possible but nothing more recent so was not sure if this was still a limitation or there is a workaround that may be suggested without having to manually set the sequence number back to 1 each time. I've been looking for a way to reset the number sequencing when batch renaming in Bridge but have not been able to find a way to do this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |